SSD Ranking: The Fastest Solid State Drives
Want to remove the speed limit on your PC? How about revving up the transfers and reads on your servers? Here’s the list of the fastest SSDs around at the time of writing.
This list is not aspiring to be the final word on SSD performance–only a rough guide to NAND Flash-based storage. It is primarily based on sequential read and write speeds (ideal circumstances); keep in mind that there are several other factors that should be taken into consideration when choosing a solid state drive, not least reliability. For example, the old hard drive MTBF (Mean Time Before Failure) value is still commonly (and erroneously) used by manufacturers but is defunct in the SSD era. An SSD’s life span is determined by the number of times each block can be written to before it wears out, where SLC (Single-Level Cell) NAND is superior to MLC (Multi-Level Cell), which in turn is superior to TLC (you guessed it: Triple-Level Cell) NAND. On top of which the older (e.g. 34nm) production process is more durable than the newer (e.g. 25nm) process and so on. For the average home or office user this is not a major issue, since a 25nm MLC-based drive will still last for many years and likely outlive the rest of the computer, but it is a critical factor if you plan to use it in a heavy-duty server, for example. Hence the separate lists for ‘consumer’ and ‘enterprise’ 2.5-inch drives (please note that the enterprise list is not updated as frequently).
Table of Contents
Top 10 Consumer SSDs
Top 10 Enterprise SSDs
Top 10 PCI-Express SSDs
Consumer/Client Drives (2.5-inch MLC)
1. Samsung 840 Pro
Available Capacities: 64GB – 512GB
Interface: SATA III 6Gbps
540MB/s read (256GB)
520MB/s write (256GB)
Samsung’s biggest strength in the SSD segment so far has been reliability–some have opted for Samsung drives mainly on account of their hassle-free operation, even if other SSDs have been ahead in terms of bandwidth. As for the 840 Pro series, we don’t know much about the drive’s endurance and reliability (because it’s brand new), but it sure is fast. Even if the sequential transfer rates only seem to indicate that the drive is on par with most of the other high-end drives, throughput in random and incompressible transfers as well as overall performance benchmarks put the 840 Pro at the top of the heap. This drive is not to be confused with the regular 840 SSD, which uses lower-quality TLC NAND.
| Samsung 840 Pro 256GB Price Comparison: | |||
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $229.99 | ![]() | ![]() |
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
2. OCZ Vector
Available Capacities: 128GB – 512GB
Interface: SATA 3 6Gbps
550MB/s read
530MB/s write
The Vector is OCZ’s successor to the Vertex 4 and makes the move to the 3rd revision of the manufacturer’s own Indilinx Barefoot 3 controller. The Vector offers excellent overall performance, exceeding the Samsung 840 Pro in some situations. On the downside its power consumption while idle is on the high side, which may be a concern when using the Vector as a notebook drive. Just like the Vertex 4, the Vector performs especially well in random write performance. According to OCZ it is capable of writing at up to 100,000 IOPS and reading at 95,000 IOPS (slightly less in the 128GB version). Also like its predecessor it uses synchronous MLC NAND (25nm).
The 256GB and 512GB models are both rated at 550 MB/s read and 530 MB/s write (sequential), whereas the 128GB drive is rated at 400 MB/s (sequential writes only).
| OCZ Vector 256 GB Price Comparison | |||
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $292.99 | ![]() | ![]() |
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
3. SanDisk Ultra Plus
Available Capacities: 64GB – 256GB
Interface: SATA 3 6Gbps
530 MB/s read (256 GB)
445 MB/s write (256 GB)
SanDisk is a household name in memory cards and also in OEM circles, but not so much in the consumer SSD segment. This situation will almost certainly change as this very large player starts to target the retail shelves. Another reason is that the Ultra Plus SSD apparently performs very well–at least in the largest capacity, which unfortunately is just 256GB. It uses an SS889175 controller from Marvell, similar to the one found in the Plextor M3 and the 256GB model’s sequential read and write speeds are rated at 530 MB/s and 445 MB/s, respectively.
It is important to note, however, that there’s a large reduction in sequential write performance in the lower capacities: 290 MB/s for the 128 GB model and 155 MB/s in the 64 GB model.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
4. OCZ Vertex 4
Available Capacities: 128GB – 512GB
Interface: SATA 3 6GBps
535MB/s read
200-480MB/s write
With the Vertex 4, OCZ moves away from the ubiquitous SandForce SF-2281 controller and uses its own Indilinx Everest 2 controller–a gamble that appears to have paid off. While the drive lags the sequential read performance (with compressible data) offered by the high-end SF-2281 drives, it excels in just about every other area. Random 4K IOPS performance is particularly impressive and the manufacturer claims a maximum 120,000 IOPS. The entire Vertex 4 lineup uses synchronous MLC NAND.
It is worth noting that the higher-capacity drives perform better in the sequential write area, with the 128GB model maxing out at 200 MB/s, 256GB at 380 MB/s and the larges 512GB drive delivers up to 475MB/s.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
5. Corsair Neutron GTX
Available Capacities: 120GB – 480GB
Interface: SATA 3 6GBps
Price: From $150 to $550
555MB/s read
333-510MB/s write
The Corsair Neutron GTX in many ways came as a surprise; not because Corsair produced another high-end SSD, but because of the unfamiliar controller from Link_A_Media Devices (LAMD)–a U.S.-based SoC manufacturer that was recently acquired by Hynix. The Neutron GTX’s sequential read speeds approach the limits of the SATA III interface at 555 MB/s. Sequential write speeds are 511 MB/s in the 240 GB and 480 GB capacities and 330 MB/s in the 120 GB unit. What is also impressive is that random read/write performance is equally high. In all, the Neutron GTX is a surprising but welcome addition to the high-end SSD market and shows that LAMD is a forced to be reckoned with going forward.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
6. Plextor M3 Pro
Available Capacities: 128GB – 512GB
Interface: SATA 3 6GBps
Price: From $150 to $800
535-540MB/s read
350-450MB/s write
The Plextor M3 and M3 Pro both consist of the same hardware, but the firmware is different in the Pro version and allows somewhat better performance. This drive uses a Marvell controller (88SS9174) and 24nm Toggle-Mode NAND, which is higher-quality modules compared to some of the competitors. Plextor has sufficient trust in its choice of hardware to sell the Pro-series drives with a very respectable 5 year warranty. It is also very fast, of course, and competes with the top drives in almost every area and outperforms them in some.
| Plextor M3 Pro 128GB Price Comparison: | |||
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $212.44 | ![]() | ![]() |
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
7. Intel 520 Series
Available Capacities: 60GB – 480GB
Interface: SATA 3 6GBps
Price: From $150.00 to $1,138
550MB/s read (240GB)
520MB/s write (240GB)
Intel is back on top of the enthusiast consumer segment again–interestingly with the help of SandForce instead of an Intel controller. The 510 series uses the same SF-2281 controller that currently resides in countless other high-end SSDs. The difference is that Intel uses a unique, proprietary firmware that has been thoroughly tested and validated. With maximum sequential transfer rates of 550 MB/s (read) and 520 MB/s (write), the 520 series is clearly in a comfortable position in terms of performance, but the strongest argument in favor of Intel is reliability.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
8. Mushkin Chronos Deluxe
Available Capacities: 120GB – 240GB
Interface: SATA 3 6GBps
Price: From $204.99 to $999.00
560MB/s read (240GB)
520MB/s write (240GB)
As our reader Itchy kindly pointed out, the numbers on the new Mushkin Chronos are indeed good. Just like so many other drives in the top tier of the SSD game it uses the SandForce SF-2281 processor, which consistently break new speed barriers as the manufacturers quietly improve their drives with new and more efficient firmware iterations.
The Chronos (also available in a “Deluxe” version) is available in the 120GB and 240GB capacities and do not only deliver excellent throughput in the sequential read/write area (560MB/s and 520MB/s, respectively), it also excels in 4K random writes with 90,000 IOPS with synchronous NAND.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
9. Corsair Force GT
Available Capacities: 60GB – 240GB
Interface: SATA 3 6GBps
Price: From $204.99 to $999.00
555MB/s read (240GB)
525MB/s write (240GB)
Built upon the latest iteration of the SandForce controller (benchmarks here), SF-2281. It has broken the speed barrier by using 25nm synchronous NAND, a much more expensive solution compared to the asynchronous NAND found in drives such as the Agility 3 and many others. Overall, from speed to read/write to build quality, the Force GT is indeed the best SSD in our book.
The 120GB and 60GB drives have the same 555MB/s maximum read throughput. The difference lies in the write throughput: 525MB/s for the 240GB, 515MB/s for the 120GB and 495MB/s for the 60GB. The IOPS measures are equally high at 85,000 IOPS (random write 4KB aligned) for the 240GB and 120GB drives and 80,000 IOPS for the 60GB drive.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
10. Kingston HyperX
Available Capacities: 120GB – 240GB
Interface: SATA 3 6GBps
Price: From $269.99 to $519.99
555MB/s read
510MB/s write
Using the same SandForce controller as the Corsair Force GT as well as synchronous NAND, this SSD from Kingston is also a cut above a majority of the SF-2281-based drives . With compressible data and a SATA 3.0 interface, it leapfrogs to 555MB/s for both drive capacities. The HyperX also has some other very good numbers: 60,000 IOPS on sustained random 4K writes and 95,000 IOPS random read.
| Kingston HyperX Prices (120GB): | |||
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $182.95 | ![]() | ![]() |
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
11. Samsung SSD 830
Available Capacities: 64GB – 512GB
Interface: SATA 3 6GBps
Price: From $100 to $800 (approx.)
520MB/s read (256GB)
400MB/s write (256GB)
Samsung’s SATA III (6GBps) drive has gone from strength to strength in reviews across the web, and here is our comparison to the Vertex 3. Unlike all of the above drives, this SSD is built entirely by Samsung and comes with Samsung’s exceptional reliability track record as an added bonus. It doesn’t quite measure up to some of the SF-2281 based drives in some areas such as compressed sequential read speeds, but exceed them in others. While the maximum sequential read speeds are the same in all capacities, the 400MB/s write speed is only reached with the 256GB and 512GB versions.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
12. Crucial m4
Available Capacities: 64GB – 512GB
Interface: SATA 3 6GBps
Price: approx. $99 to $699
500MB/s read (250GB model)
270MB/s write (250GB model)
The Crucial m4 is another alternative to the myriad SF-2281 SSDs and outperforms them in many areas where incompressible data is involved. It became even better with the update to firmware revision 0009 (review here) and is definitely an option to consider when looking for a good all-round SSD. A detail worth noting is that the higher-capacity drives offer better performance.
| Crucial m4 256GB Prices: | |||
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $206.99 | ![]() | ![]() |
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
Enterprise Drives (2.5-inch SLC) Note: Update Pending

1.
STEC ZeusIOPS XE
Interface: SAS
Available Capacities: up to 600GB
Price: Contact STEC
500MB/s read
275MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 70K IOPS
STEC recently launched the successor to its ZeusIOPS–the ZeusIOPS XE–which is allegedly three times as durable as previous generations thanks to its so-called enterprise MLC NAND (eMLC). It connects over SAS and reaches up to 115,000 IOPS when reading and 70,000 IOPS when writing.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
2. OCZ Deneva 2 SLC
Interface: SATA III 6Gbps
Available Capacities: 50GB – 200GB
Price: N/A
550MB/s read
530MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 80K IOPS
OCZ’s Deneva 2 is equipped with MLC, eMLC (enterprise MLC), as well as high-quality SLC NAND. Although it’s an enterprise drive it is not a SAS drive but uses the 6 Gbps SATA III interface (if you need SAS, you may want to have a look at OCZ’s Talos series). Performance is excellent regardless of capacity: 500 MB/s read bandwidth, 530 MB/s write and 80 000 IOPS for 4K random write operations.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
3. Pliant LB 150S
Interface: SAS
Available Capacities: 150GB
Price: $3,800.00
420MB/s read
220MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 35K IOPS
Pliant might not be as well known as other drive makers or even as established (they were founded in 2006), but it certainly is out to change that with the LB 150S. Part of their Lightning Series, this drive features two full duplex SAS ports, unlimited read and write endurance and end-to-end data protection with T10 DIF support. We’ve found that of the 2.5-inch SAS drives available, the LB150S is the fastest around.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
4. Seagate Pulsar XT.2
Interface: SAS
Available Capacities: 100GB – 400GB
Price: Contact Seagate
360MB/s read
300MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 22K IOPS
The Pulsar XT.2 is the fastest drive from Seagate. It’s currently shipping to OEMs and is expected to be more widely available during Q2 2011. Among its top features are a 25 petabyte written lifetime, self-encrypting drive option and having the fastest write speed for a 2.5-inch SAS drive.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
5. Micron RealSSD P300
Interface: SATA 3
Available Capacities: 50GB – 200GB
Price: Contact Micron
360MB/s read
275MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 45.2K IOPS
The P300 is Micron’s entry to the enterprise SLC market. In terms of durability, it was tested and found able to handle 3.5 petabytes of data writes in its lifetime, or about 2TB every day for five years. It’s also low-power at only 2.1W consumption, making it a good choice for server locations that want to be more green.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
6. Runcore Glory IV
Interface: SATA 2 Available Capacities: 32GB – 128GB
Price: Contact Runcore
262MB/s read
201MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 2560 IOPS
With a cache of 64MB, this drive minimizes wait times and reduces wear. It also claims 80 year write endurance and 1M hours MTBF.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
7. RunCore Kylin II
Interface: SAS Available Capacities: 50GB, 100GB
Price: Contact Runcore
260MB/s read
260MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 30K IOPS
What stands out immediately about this drive is it’s gold casing. Aside from that, another noticeable quality about the Kylin II is it supports 128-bit AES encryption with an optional disk password, as well as ECC.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
8. Intel X25-E Extreme
Interface: SATA
Available Capacities: 32GB, 64GB
Price: $371.90, $543.90 respectively
250MB/s read
170MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 3300 IOPS
Built upon the success of the X25-M, the X-25-E now utilizes SLC NAND for better performance. While not exceptional in terms of specs, it does provide an affordable entry for IT pros on a budget.
| Intel X25-E Extreme 32GB | |||
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $779.95 | ![]() | ![]() |
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
9. WD SiliconDrive N1x
Interface: SATA
Available Capacities: 32GB – 128GB
Price: $351.29 to $3,404.20
240MB/s read
140MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 3500 IOPS
WD markets this drive as for “write-intensive embedded systems requiring superior performance and reliability.” To attest to this, the SiliconDrive N1X can have a maximum of 701.4GB of data written to it everyday and all drives are backed with a 5-year warranty. Other features include advanced error correction, wear-leveling and data integrity protection.
| WD SiliconDrive N1X 64GB | |||
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $950.19 | ![]() | ![]() |
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
10. STEC MACH16
Interface: SATA
Available Capacities: up to 400GB
Price: Contact STEC
225MB/s read (IOPS version)
200MB/s write (IOPS version)
Random 4K Write: 15K IOPS (IOPS version)
The MACH16 promises speed and protection in one package. It includes power down protection, best-in-class error correction and wear leveling. These class of devices are often used in military settings which should attest to the quality of these drives.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
Top 10 PCI Express SSDs
1. FusionIO ioDrive Octal
Interface: PCI-Express x16 Gen2.0
Available Capacities: 5.120TB
Price: Contact FusionIO
6000MB/s read
4400MB/s write
Random 512B Write: 1.18M IOPS
The ioDrive Octal is by far the fastest drive we’ve gone through. It has eight ioDrives on a single PCIe card (hence the name). It’s been used by the US government and the deployment of 220 Octals was able to reach a staggering 1TB/s bandwidth. Steve Wozniak, co-founder of Apple, even speaks highly of this product which is probably why he joined them as chief scientist.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
2. Foremay EC188 D-Series
Interface: PCI Express Single, Dual and Hexa-Bus
Available Capacities: 125GB – 12TB
Price: Contact Foremay
4500MB/s read (Model-W Hexa Bus)
3500MB/s write (Model-W Hexa Bus)
Random 4K Write: 180K IOPS (Model-W Hexa Bus)
The EC188 D-Series is one of most versatile lines from Foremay. It is available from single bus to hexa bus, bringing more storage space and more bandwidth with it. It’s been used in a wide array of fields from medical imaging and scientific research to mobile content servers and security applications.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–

3. FusionIO ioDrive2 Duo
Interface: PCI-Express x4/x8 or PCI Express 2.0 x4
Available Capacities: 1.2TB – 2.4TB
Price: Contact FusionIO
3000MB/s read (1.2TB)
2600MB/s write 1.2TB)
512B Write: 937K IOPS (1.2TB)
The ioDrive2 Duo replaces the older ioDrive Duo and offers incredible performance for enterprise users. It is available in two different capacities–1.2TB (SLC) and 2.4GB (MLC)–and the SLC version is the fastest with 2,600MB/s write bandwidth and 3,000MB/s read bandwidth. Write IOPS (512B) is above 900K for both capacities.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
4. OCZ RevoDrive 3 X2
Interface: PCI Express 2.0 x 4
Available Capacities: 240GB – 960GB
Price: From $599.99 to $3,099.99
1500MB/s read
1300MB/s write (960GB model)
This PCI drive boasts OCZ’s proprietary Virtualized Controller Architecture 2.0 (VCA) technology and OCZ’s SuperScale storage accelerator. It exceeds its predecessor’s performance record and has an amazing 230,000 IOPS maximum random write (4KB aligned).
| OCZ RevoDrive 3 X2 Prices (240GB): | |||
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $650.98 | ![]() | ![]() |
| OCZ RevoDrive 3 X 2 240 GB PCI Express 4 GB-s Slim Solid State Drive - RVD3X2-FHPX4-240G | |||
————————————————————————————————————————————————–

5. Foremay PC166 W-Series
Interface: PCI Express Single and Dual Bus
Available Capacities: 100GB – 4000GB
Price: Contact Foremay
1500MB/s read (Dual Bus)
1100MB/s write (Dual Bus)
The PC166 was specifically designed with TRIM in mind and complies with the Windows 7 SSD TRIM command, imporving write speed significantly and reducing writing degredation.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
6. OCZ Z-Drive R2 P88
Interface: PCI-Express interface (x8), 8 x SATA Controllers
Available Capacities: 512GB, 1TB, 2TB
Price: $2,249.00, $3,750.00 and $8,199.00 respectively
1400MB/s read
1400MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 30K IOPS
One of the main upsides of the Z-Drive is its ability to be used as a bootable device, making it a compelling choice for SANs, servers and workstations. Some of its other features are a 512MB cache, SAS compatibility and 3-year warranty.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
7. OCZ Z-Drive R2 E88
Interface: PCI-Express x8, 8 x SATA Controllers
Available Capacities: 512GB
Price: $9,149.00
1400MB/s read
1400MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 7200 IOPS
The main difference between this an the P88 is the usage of SLC NAND instead of MLC, dramatically increasing reliability and reducing wear. One of the main upsides of the Z-Drive is its ability to be used as a bootable device, making it a compelling choice for SANs, servers and workstations. It also consumes less power compared to hard drive arrays.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
8. Photofast GM-PowerDrive
Interface: PCI-Express 2.0 x8
Available Capacities: 256GB, 512GB, 1TB
Price: Contact Photofast
1400MB/s read
1500MB/s write
This drive from Photofast is one of the few that has its maximum sequential write speed (1500MB/s) actually exceed its maximum read (1400MB/s). It is also one of the few housed in a sleek red housing. This is an Asian only device though but if you are in Japan or nearby, you might be able to get a hold of this.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
9. OCZ VeloDrive 3
Interface: PCI-Express x8, 4 x SATA controllers
Available Capacities: 160GB – 320GB
Price: Contact OCZ
1100MB/s read
1010MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 75000 IOPS
This drive has an onboard RAID controller so you can execute both hardware RAID and software RAID, though for the software you will need to find your own as OCZ doesn’t provide this. For hardware raid, it can reach up to 1100MB/s read and 1010MB/s write with a random 4K aligned write of 75,000 IOPS. Maximum performance for software RAID is 1,100MB/s read, 1030MB/s write and 125,000 IOPS random 4k aligned write.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
10. OCZ Z-Drive R3 P84
Interface: PCI-Express 2.0, X8 slot, half height, half length, 4 x SATA Controllers
Available Capacities: 300GB, 600GB, 1.2TB
Price: Contact OCZ
1000MB/s read
970MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 135K IOPS
The smaller footprint of the R3 should entice those who want faster storage for their compact servers. It also has a redesigned heatsink and a Super-Cap that will let it complete write operations in the even of a power failure.
————————————————————————————————————————————————–
We’ve tried our best to compile the most comprehensive list of SSD drive available and used this to create the lists you see above. Since there seems to be a new set of drive launched each month, we shall update our list and ratings regularly. Also, if you think we’ve omitted something or need correction, don’t hesitate to leave a comment or contact us.
















54 Responses to “SSD Ranking: The Fastest Solid State Drives”
Quite an informative review.
Comment made on April 10th, 2011 at 12:21 pmThe quality of reviews have considerably increased since the first ones. Now they are realistic, and it is good, because in many sources all you can find is an annoying advertisement packing consumers with apparently deceiving information.
The manufacturers are not in a hurry to produce something revolutionary new and ready as a final, standards-compliant, reliable product, most of the time they are going for profit, which delays the introduction of new technologies for many years. Server market may be considered an exception though, because deceiving the customers doesn’t work well there.
This tendency is true for many other “modern” retail customer products now. For example, LED LCDs, which in fact have lower full spectrum reproduction range (yes, much lower than those with CCFL backlight) and some issues with flickering, but higher visual color reproduction range (just for eyes though).
On the side note, you made it a bit tricky to pick up a desired avatar
Comment made on April 10th, 2011 at 12:23 pmThanks vt! Actually a ton of research has gone into this from my colleague Glenn who wrote the piece and we plan to update it regularly. Hopefully it stays fresh for a couple of weeks… It’s a bit opportunistically based on “top speed” only, but that seemed logical considering this site’s name.
And yes, something has to be done about those avatars
Comment made on April 11th, 2011 at 2:56 pmWhy aren’t the OCZ RevoDrive X2 or the original one listed on this site?
http://www.ocztechnology.com/products/solid-state-drives/pci-express/enthusiast.html
Comment made on May 24th, 2011 at 11:35 pm@CMW: Yes, the RevoDrive X2 could probably be listed as drive #11 with 740/720MB/s reads/writes
Comment made on May 25th, 2011 at 2:25 amSo many SSDs missing from this list it makes it obsolete from the get go..
Comment made on May 26th, 2011 at 12:37 pm@Simon: That’s because the “get go” was a couple of months ago. It’s been updated.
Comment made on June 2nd, 2011 at 6:51 amI’m still waiting for SLC NAND prices to go down, but they (the manufacturers) aren’t willing to cut them, while SLC chips have only 2x lower capacity.
Spot price for 32 GBit MLC NAND – 5.41 $
Spot price for 16 Gbit SLC NAND – 13.12 $
That means that SLC NAND chips are unreasonably almost 2.42x more expensive than they could be. The manufacturers are way too greedy …
Also, at this rate they are going to intentionally hinder more advanced SSD products with MRAM or FeRAM or other similar technology – just to get back the money and profit from their investments into NAND. That most likely means another 5 year without any good replacement to NAND. And no alternate to NAND SLC solutions, with the exception of DRAM SSDs, which are, of course, have greater potential for random I/O and bandwidth than any NAND product.
Comment made on June 5th, 2011 at 1:29 pmJust wondering… Why are none of the SSD’s that OWC makes not included here?
JQ
Comment made on July 3rd, 2011 at 8:48 am> The manufacturers are way too greedy …
Welcome to capitalism! Enough people are willing to pay more so of course they’re going to charge as much as possible. This is always how the storage market goes.
For example, it is pointless to have two different interfaces – SAS and SATA. Yet this is what allows them to stick it harder to people who will pay a lot more for just a little more speed. Same thing going all the way back to the early SCSI/IDE days.
Comment made on July 26th, 2011 at 7:17 amDoes mushkin not even make the top 10? The numbers on their Chronos look good.
Comment made on August 14th, 2011 at 9:52 pmThanks for pointing that out, the numbers certainly look very good!
Comment made on September 7th, 2011 at 4:51 pmNice listing but its credibility suffers. I will never place Mushkin Chronos that high. Mushkin Chronos will never beat the OCZ Vertex 3 Max IOPS in benchmarks. There are lots of benchmarking sites that show that the numbers on Mushkin Chronos are the fake ones. OCZ is that low on the list only because they are telling the real numbers. The price of Mushkin is really low when comparing to the others and that makes is interesting product. But the failing performance numbers tell something about the manufacturers strategy…
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/45871-mushkin-chronos-deluxe-120gb-ssd-review-12.html
http://thessdreview.com/our-reviews/mushkin-chronos-deluxe-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-pcmark-vantage-comparison-and-the-verdict/
Reliable listing by performance should always base on the independent benchmarking not the numbers the manufacturers are telling.
Comment made on September 12th, 2011 at 11:39 pmGreat review of drives…
Comment made on September 17th, 2011 at 9:41 ammanufacturer’s too greedy? Being a person who works for one the worlds largest companies and hearing this all the time, its just a stupid comment. People don’t realize the dollars spent and R&D in order to increase drive speeds, etc.. prices will come down, just give the companys time to make back some of their money. If you want a cheap SSD , buy a first gen drive, that the companies have droped the price because they are out of the “red”.
“Being a person who works for one the worlds largest companies and hearing this all the time, its just a stupid comment.”
Comment made on September 17th, 2011 at 6:46 pmStupid for those who make money on that ? Maybe. But not for customers. There is no excuse for overblown prices on SLC memory chips, there is no excuse for hindering the progressive technologies just to make the most profit of the old and inefficient ones.
Also, if you read the other comments, I already revealed the lies and deception all over the retail non-server SSD market, and I have really a lot of other facts worth mentioning regarding your REALLY stupid comment.
Comment made on September 17th, 2011 at 6:58 pm@maggou,
Comment made on September 20th, 2011 at 6:33 amThanks for the links. It certainly looks like a revision of the list is needed. I would personally not interpret the numbers as fake though, they are probably correct in synthetic benchmarks under optimal conditions. On the other hand, the Vertex 3 has had its share of firmware issues, but it is starting to look more and more solid and mature.
funny how you missed the m4 with 0009 firmware cause its the fastest drive
Comment made on November 8th, 2011 at 9:04 amMaybe there are missing some SSDs which coult be definitely in this list?!
like
http://www.supertalent.com/products/ssd_category_detail.php?type=RAIDDrive
http://www.amazon.com/600281-B21-Plug-Module-Solid-State/dp/tech-data/B003TL2WA8/ref=de_a_smtd
http://www.storagesearch.com/ssd-fastest.html
Comment made on November 8th, 2011 at 4:09 pm>>JimQ Said:
Comment made on November 16th, 2011 at 7:14 amJust wondering… Why are none of the SSD’s that OWC makes not included here?
JQ
—–
Perhaps because OWC doesn’t make anything at all, they just relabel the very stuff you are seeing above. Also because you most likely work there.
TO THE MODERATOR
Don’t be a money hungry bunch of pigs — seriously. OWC will pay you to review their crap, and tie an advertising contract to it.
That’s no reason to review what you know is a relabeled product. There isn’t anything that’s “made to order” – assuming you don’t count a package type and the length of a cable!!
Just review any of his other reviews — and then look at the amount of advertising he has on each of those, especially the dedicated Mac sites — where he lets those people keep product and takes out yearly contracts.
That removes ALL the integrity that you are trying to establish. Don’t fall for that kind of scam – you’ll become as unworthy as the rest who do the same thing, vs. businesses that are growing on their own innovation, rather than by slime-ball tactics that also include pressure to remove posts made by those who criticize their customer service or sometimes crap products.
They have some good stuff, and they also deceive where it is convenient. Don’t be part of that crowd that helps out a company that does that sort of thing. In the future it will become clear that you don’t want any association with this group. “Do No Evil” is not part of their mantra.
Comment made on November 16th, 2011 at 7:55 am@Bubu: Thanks for the tips! However, the RAM drives you link to are volatile and belong in their own separate category IMO.
Comment made on November 17th, 2011 at 2:12 amthere were news from OCZ, see http://www.oczenterprise.com/ssd-products/deneva-2-3.0-2.5-slc.html and http://www.ocztechnology.com/ocz-revodrive-3-x2-max-iops-pci-express-ssd.html…
Comment made on November 19th, 2011 at 9:26 amHow is the Vertex 3 faster than the Mushkin? According to your dates the Mushkin has 10MB/s faster readrates or am I missing something? Would be great to know how you rate them exactly as I am about to purchase one of them…
Comment made on December 26th, 2011 at 5:23 amfusionIO’s ioDrive Octal is now available in 10.24tb
Comment made on January 1st, 2012 at 1:02 pmhttp://www.fusionio.com/platforms/iodrive-octal/
Probably a bit off-topic – http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2198385
Comment made on January 12th, 2012 at 11:59 amIt is about AMD processors. They didn’t mention the fact that JFAMD DID know about the performance problems. I asked him several questions under different accounts, and the differences in his answers (lies) unambiguously pointed out the fact that he did know about the IPC problems, moreover he did know about the actual benchmarks and that it wouldn’t even meet the IPC of the older Intel processors. That was fun getting reaction out of him and getting the truth that way (he plainly reacted offensively at correct guesses, so by varying the questions and information given to him and watching his anger one could easily figure the exact benchmarks numbers with amazingly high precision).
But well, he did one good thing – he led hundreds of PR idiots alongside, who have got their “expert” and “trustworthy” accounts compromised.
Comment made on January 12th, 2012 at 12:36 pm@Alan: The difference between the SF-2281 drives is marginal, and the quoted speeds are not to be taken as gospel. In real-world tests the Vertex 3 Max IOPS generally beat most of the competition (MLC in the same form factor). But you have a point, this listing is due for an update.
Comment made on January 23rd, 2012 at 2:17 amvt: Interesting thread. It’s hard to defend the indefensible…
Comment made on January 23rd, 2012 at 2:50 amIt’s a good list – but the speed is Sequential read and writes? Of course it’s the thing the manufacturers publish as they are impressive to see – in real use though Random read and writes are more important to the average user – IOPS more important in the Enterprise market…
Comment made on January 28th, 2012 at 3:31 pmHow about including the NEW OWC Mercury extreme Pro 6g 240gb with SANDFORCE 2282. I think they are the only company using this controller and tests have shown this is a very fast drive.
Comment made on March 9th, 2012 at 2:15 pm[...] may be priced in dollars but the spec remains the same: SSD Ranking: The Fastest Solid State Drives – April 2012 __________________ Wisdom is ofttimes nearer when we stoop than when we soar. – William [...]
Comment made on April 27th, 2012 at 2:52 amWow, apparently a walmart employee wrote the OCZ post.
The Vertex 4 is slower then the vertex 3 in transferring data.
Changing the controller has not paid off in real world applications.
The consumer has turned into a clown, putting up with lies from the garbage Asus, and their failed Sata 3 marvell 9128, the joke of Intel building CPU’s for the outdated lga 1155.
Seems not enough money has been made so the hardware has been shoved into reverse.
What’s next for the fools, building systems on the LGA 775.
The future is the entire point of upgrading not downgrading.
The hardware industry needs a wake up call and needs to work on real Sata 3 controllers, building off the LGA 2011, and getting PCI-E 3.0 to actually work at 3.0 speed.
Marvell the failures, the upgraded 9220, and 9230 are garbage.
The 9128 and 9172 are absolute garbage and they should be sued for calling their junk Sata 3.
Buy Asus and stay behind the times.
Then we have Intel with Ivy Bridge, no real gains in per thread.
Good thing the consumer just keeps buying garbage with no gains no real steps and using old hardware.
Comment made on May 17th, 2012 at 4:11 am@odiebugs: About the difference between the Vertex 3 and 4, yes, but it’s not quite that simple:
Comment made on May 28th, 2012 at 3:14 pmhttp://www.anandtech.com/show/5719/ocz-vertex-4-review-256gb-512gb/3
In the enterprise section you missed listing the latest generation for OCZ, which has been out since October of last year
Comment made on June 7th, 2012 at 12:11 pmhttp://www.oczenterprise.com/ssd-products/z-drive-r4-c-series.html
Thanks Bruce! An update to the enterprise section is long overdue. Thanks for the reminder.
Comment made on June 21st, 2012 at 4:26 pmThis ADATA SSD drive should be number 2 after the Intel and number 1 if you compare to the price.
Comment made on July 6th, 2012 at 5:21 amHow often can we expect this list to be updated?
There are often changes going on.
Nice list btw..but it’s almost half a year out of date now.
Bård,
Comment made on August 8th, 2012 at 1:38 amNorway
very informative..but i suggest adding corsair force gs to the list..its an upgraded version of corsair forc gt and its the fastest ssd that has been launched by corsair yet..the sandisk ultra also should be added
Comment made on August 8th, 2012 at 7:35 am[...] [...]
Comment made on August 17th, 2012 at 2:29 amHello,
We have RunCore SSD for our better server and there are no comparaison with HDD.
We have buy our SSD on http://www.ipczeninformatique.fr for our good price.
What is the best SSD with PCIE for animation computer ?
What is the most important in SSD for have the best result in Photoshop?
Thank you
Comment made on August 19th, 2012 at 4:24 pmLaure
@ADMIN, true, I do see nice gains in small R/W, 4k IOPS 120,000. Personally this drive is dependable and quick. Just in very large writes does it pace back a bit. A lot of people are having problems with some of the SSD’s, but they are mostly BIOS and windows problems that the consumer is blaming on the SSD. Now if Intel would stop crawling with the Ivy bridge-E so we can see the LGA 2011 to show its true colors, life would be better. If you update this review, you might have to add in the Corsair Force GS as top dog. Asus still putting that garbage Marvell 9128 on boards.
Comment made on September 21st, 2012 at 12:02 amhttp://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4397188/HP-Hynix-memristor-debut-pushed-back
Comment made on October 1st, 2012 at 1:57 amAnother proof that they are just getting the most $$$ out of outdated technologies (especially NAND MLC).
[...] even close. He would be better not wasting the extra money for the 840 pro and going with an 830 SSD Ranking: The Fastest Solid State Drives – October 2012 [...]
Comment made on October 30th, 2012 at 11:18 amPrices seem wrong. In most cases the high
price is misleading since many sites HAD and
have the highest capacity items for about 1/2
the price shown.
For example, you show:
“2. OCZ Vertex 4
Available Capacities: 128GB – 512GB
Price: From $399.00 to $1,899″
but the prices 512GB were generally in the
Comment made on December 22nd, 2012 at 5:10 amhigh US$400′s to low US$500′s. (The
highest price Froogle found on 12/22 was
$712.49, but I don’t know the high price
in the past.)
Thanks for the catch Mark, this has to be changed ASAP.
Comment made on January 8th, 2013 at 5:22 amhi, i have seen the Samsung 840 Pro but u dindt put the diferent transference rates that varies about the capacity… do the samsung are the same rate in all the capacities?
ty
Comment made on January 29th, 2013 at 8:14 amExcellent article. Thanks. Perhaps you can answer another question. What is the difference in speed and quality between the SanDisk “Extreme” series SSD and their “Ultra Plus” product? Thanks
Comment made on February 18th, 2013 at 9:37 amI’ve actually found that since the 1.5.1 firmware update for the OCZ Vertex 4 it has made is MUCH! Faster. The usual speeds I get from it are about 550MB/s read and about 490MB/a write. This making it the 2nd fastest drive in the market.
Comment made on February 19th, 2013 at 5:23 pmI just want to say that I appreciate you guys making this website a lot. I am building a fast computer coming out of high school and I wanted to find the best SSD’s that I can run my favorite games and OS on. Using your site, I will be able to make my search for one component that much easier, which is nice when you have to search for a lot of them. XD
Thanks again!
Comment made on March 14th, 2013 at 12:41 pmGreat post. I was checking continuously this blog and I’m impressed! Very useful information specially the final part
I maintain such info a lot. I used to be looking for this particular info for a very long time. Thank you and good luck.
Comment made on March 17th, 2013 at 11:41 amA bit of offtopic:
http://www.innodisk.com/AboutInnodisk/NewsDetail.aspx?bmV3c19Hcm91cElEPWFjMDdmNWIyLTU3MDYtNGM4OS04YWU4LTYwMzc3NTk4NGUxNiZuZXdzX2RmbElEPTAwMQ%3d%3d
That is what I was talking about here quite long ago using MLC in “SLC” mode. As you can see, those “new” technologies are quite predictable.
Comment made on March 29th, 2013 at 9:35 amIt’s all very well posting these’s speeds for SATA 3 users. But what about all us SATA 2 users. We need to know the speed/s we will get on SATA 2 using SATA 3 drives as well. Also raid speeds would help to.
So lets see some tests here.
I have 2 Crucial C300s 128GB in raid. On SATA 2
Read is around R 530 MB/s and W 260 MB/s.
As a single drive set up, R 267 MB/s and W 140 MB/s
Comment made on April 1st, 2013 at 11:38 amAnother failure, this time at processor market – it looks like Haswell is going to be slower than its predecessor in memory-intensive applications. Not to mention that its caches may be actually slower as well in such applications. Probably defect Xeons (socket 2011) are the only good alternative for upgrading
Comment made on May 12th, 2013 at 1:54 pmLeave a Comment