free web stats

SSD Ranking: The Fastest Solid State Drives

by: Glenn Santos Friday, January 1st, 2016

Want to remove the speed limit on your PC? How about revving up the transfers and reads on your servers? Here’s the list of the fastest SSDs around at the time of writing (May 2016).This list is not attempting to be the final word on SSD performance – just a rough guide to NAND Flash-based storage. It is primarily based on sequential read and write speeds (ideal circumstances); keep in mind that there are several other factors that should be taken into consideration when choosing a solid state drive, not least reliability. To put it simply, an SSD’s life span is determined by the number of times each block can be written to before it wears out. SLC (Single-Level Cell) NAND is more durable than MLC (Multi-Level Cell), which in turn is more durable than TLC (Triple-Level Cell) NAND. On top of which an older (e.g. 34nm) production process is more durable than a newer (e.g. 25nm) process and so on. For the average home or office user this is not really an issue though, since any MLC-based drive will still last for years and likely outlive the rest of an average home or office computer by a wide margin. But don’t rely on affordable drives with cheap NAND in a server, or any other environment with a continuous, high workload and similarly high reliability requirements.

Table of Contents
Top 10 SATA (Consumer) SSDs
Top 10 Enterprise SSDs
Top 10 PCI-Express SSDs

Consumer Drives (2.5-inch SATA, 6 Gbps)

Samsung 840 Pro1. Samsung 850 Pro

Available Capacities: 128GB – 1TB
Interface: SATA III 6Gbps
550MB/s read (256GB)
520MB/s write (256GB)

Samsung’s biggest strength in the SSD segment so far has been reliability–many have opted for Samsung drives mainly on account of their hassle-free operation. Unlike many other known brands that rely on third-party components, including NAND modules as well as the even more important controller, Samsung uses its own hardware throughout. The 850 Pro series uses its own MEX controller in combination with state-of-the-art 3D NAND (V-NAND), which increases density without compromising on performance. Indeed, the 850 Pro series is consistently ahead of the competition in most areas, so you will have to move away from the SATA interface to see better performance.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

sandisk extreme pro2. SanDisk Extreme Pro

Available Capacities: 240GB – 960GB
Interface: SATA 3 6Gbps
550MB/s read
520MB/s write

SanDisk’s Extreme Pro is a direct successor to the Extreme II (see below). Just like its predecessor the drive lives up to the expectations implied in the model name. It is slightly ahead of the Extreme II in most areas with sequential read speeds of 550 MB/s and write speeds of 520 MB/s (4K random read/write 100K/90K IOPS), although you will hardly notice the difference in everyday tasks.

More importantly though, SanDisk is confident enough to offer a 10-year warranty with the Extreme Pro – a unique offer in the consumer segment. The 19nm MLC NAND is allegedly good for writing 22 GB of data per day for 10 years. Consequently, when this drive finally wears out in the average system built today, the SATA interface will be long since obsolete.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK


Mushkin Striker3. Mushkin Striker

Available Capacities: 240GB – 960GB
565MB/s read
550MB/s write

Mushkin is one of the few companies that does everything in-house in the US, from design to engineering to testing. The drive uses the Phison PS-3110-S10 controller and a Micron 16nm MLC NAND. The Striker has a read speed of up to 565MB/s and its write speed is up to 550MB/s.

While the 3-year warranty might be disappointing, its MBTF is a standard 2,000,000 hours. The 4KB random read for the drive is 88K IOPS and the 4KB random write is 91K IOPS.

The drive features TRIM support, SmartECC for error correction, SmartRefresh for fixing weak storage blocks, and SmartFlush to safeguard against power loss.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK


Neutron XT4. Corsair Neutron XT

Available Capacities: 240GB – 960GB
560MB/s read
540MB/s write

Corsair has long been a crowd favorite when it comes to fast drives. This gamer-focused drive promises better reliability, being backed by a 5 year warranty and SmartECC for fixing ECC failures.

The Neutron XT uses a Phison PS3110-S10 controller and Toshiba 19nm MLC NAND. The 4KB random read goes up to 100K IOPS and the 4KB random write goes up to 90K IOPS. Corsair offers a 5-year warranty on the drive. It also support SmartECC, SmartRefresh, SmartFlush, and end-to-end data path protection.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

Reviews: AnandTech,


vertex 1505. OCZ Vector 150

Available Capacities: 120GB – 480GB
Interface: SATA 3 6GBps
550MB/s read
530MB/s write

A bankruptcy was apparently needed for OCZ to get back on track. Today the company is owned by Toshiba; the OCZ brand lives on, as does its proprietary Indilinx Barefoot controller, but the NAND circuitry is of course provided by Toshiba. The 19nm Toggle-mode NAND modules performs very well in combination with the Indilinx Barefoot 3 controller in the Vector 150. In addition to excellent sequential transfer rates, random IO throughput is consistently high (up to 100K/90K IOPS read/write). Another positive aspect is the 5-year warranty that allows you to shuffle 50 GB of data per day.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK


sandisk-extreme-ii6. SanDisk Extreme II

Available Capacities: 120GB – 480GB
Interface: SATA 3 6Gbps
550MB/s read
510MB/s write

The Extreme II from Flash storage-giant SanDisk delivers excellent performance at a reasonable price point. Its sequential read speeds of 550 MB/s and write speeds of 510 MB/s are complemented by very good random read/write figures as well (95K/78K IOPS). SanDisk uses a controller from Marvell in this particlar line of SSDs – a chip with the fanciful designation 88SS9187 (also known as Monet) – with SanDisk’s own firmware and 19nm eX2 ABL MLC NAND (also from SanDisk), which makes for a particularly long-lasting combination according to several reports.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK


samsung 850 evo7. Samsung 850 EVO

Available Capacities: 120GB – 1TB
Interface: SATA 3 6Gbps
550 MB/s read
520 MB/s write

In spite of its low-end characteristics, i.e. Samsung’s use of TLC (Triple-Level-Cell) NAND, the 850 EVO performs extremely well. Not only is the sequential bandwidth excellent – the EVO also manages random read/write speeds of up to 100K/90K IOPS, according to the drive specs. While durabilty might be a concern with TLC-based drives, Samsung offers a 5-year warranty on the new EVO lineup, which is more than what you get with many high-end MLC SSDs.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK


vertex 4608. OCZ Vertex 460

Available Capacities: 120GB – 480GB
Interface: SATA 3 6GBps
540MB/s read
525MB/s write

The Vertex 460 is to the Vector 150 what the Samsung 850 EVO is to the Pro – a more budget-friendly alternative. It is similar in many ways and almost as fast as OCZ’s current flagship. While it uses the same 19nm Toshiba NAND in combination with a somewhat lower clocked Indilinx Barefoot 3 controller, the difference in pricing is reflected in the drive’s endurance rating and warranty. OCZ offers a 3-year warranty at 20GB/day, which is likely more than sufficient for most users, but significantly less than what you get with the Vector 150 (50GB/day or 5 years).

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK


Adata sp9209. ADATA Premier Pro SP 920

Available Capacities: 128GB – 1TB
Interface: SATA 3 6Gbps
560 MB/s read (512 GB/1 TB)
500 MB/s write (512 GB/1 TB)

Adata also uses a Marvell controller in its SP 920 lineup, with the designation 88SS9189. This is combined with synchronous 20m MLC NAND from Micron, which results in excellent performance in the higher-capacity variants of the SP 920. The drive is available in capacities ranging from 128 GB all the way up to 1 TB, with the 512 GB and 1 TB models offering the best performance (and most likely durability).

It is important to note that there’s a large reduction in sequential write performance in the lower-capacity variants: Sequential writes drop to 360 MB/s in the 256 GB model and a mere 180 MB/s in the 128 GB model. 4K read/write IOPS also take a hit, particularly in the 128 GB version of the SP 920. Consequently, we award the spot in the ranking to the 512GB/1TB models only.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK


Neutron GTX10. Corsair Neutron (GTX)

Available Capacities: 120GB – 480GB
Interface: SATA 3 6GBps
555MB/s read
333-510MB/s write

The Corsair Neutron GTX in many ways came as a surprise; not because Corsair produced another high-end SSD, but because of the unfamiliar controller from Link_A_Media Devices (LAMD)–a U.S.-based SoC manufacturer that was recently acquired by Hynix. The Neutron GTX’s sequential read speeds approach the limits of the SATA III interface at 555 MB/s. Sequential write speeds are 511 MB/s in the 240 GB and 480 GB capacities and 330 MB/s in the 120 GB unit. What is also impressive is that random read/write performance is equally high. In all, the Neutron GTX is a surprising but welcome addition to the high-end SSD market and shows that LAMD is a force to be reckoned with going forward.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

intel 73011. Intel 730

Available Capacities: 240GB – 480GB
Interface: SATA 3 6GBps
550MB/s read
470MB/s write (480GB)

Intel was the number one choice in the SSD space for several years, with its semi-proprietery SandForce controllers and an endurance that few competitors could match (with a few exceptions). While the latter is still likely true (Intel offers a 5-year warranty on the 730 series) the latest drives from “Chipzilla” have not quite measured up to the competition in the high end. The 730 is nevertheless a very fast drive, particularly the 480 GB model. While the sequential read speeds are an impressive 550 MB/s in both capacities, sequential writes are significantly slower in the 240 GB model (270 MB/s).

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK


Enterprise Drives (2.5-inch SLC) Note: Update Pending

zeus iops



Interface: SAS
Available Capacities: up to 600GB
Price: Contact STEC
500MB/s read
275MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 70K IOPS

STEC recently launched the successor to its ZeusIOPS–the ZeusIOPS XE–which is allegedly three times as durable as previous generations thanks to its so-called enterprise MLC NAND (eMLC). It connects over SAS and reaches up to 115,000 IOPS when reading and 70,000 IOPS when writing.

Deneva 22. OCZ Deneva 2 SLC

Interface: SATA III 6Gbps
Available Capacities: 50GB – 200GB
Price: N/A
550MB/s read
530MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 80K IOPS

OCZ’s Deneva 2 is equipped with MLC, eMLC (enterprise MLC), as well as high-quality SLC NAND. Although it’s an enterprise drive it is not a SAS drive but uses the 6 Gbps SATA III interface (if you need SAS, you may want to have a look at OCZ’s Talos series). Performance is excellent regardless of capacity: 500 MB/s read bandwidth, 530 MB/s write and 80 000 IOPS for 4K random write operations.

3. Pliant LB 150S

Interface: SAS
Available Capacities: 150GB
Price: $3,800.00
420MB/s read
220MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 35K IOPS

Pliant might not be as well known as other drive makers or even as established (they were founded in 2006), but it certainly is out to change that with the LB 150S. Part of their Lightning Series, this drive features two full duplex SAS ports, unlimited read and write endurance and end-to-end data protection with T10 DIF support. We’ve found that of the 2.5-inch SAS drives available, the LB150S is the fastest around.


Seagate Pulsar4. Seagate Pulsar XT.2

Interface: SAS
Available Capacities: 100GB – 400GB
Price: Contact Seagate
360MB/s read
300MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 22K IOPS

The Pulsar XT.2 is the fastest drive from Seagate. It’s currently shipping to OEMs and is expected to be more widely available during Q2 2011. Among its top features are a 25 petabyte written lifetime, self-encrypting drive option and having the fastest write speed for a 2.5-inch SAS drive.

realssd p3005. Micron RealSSD P300

Interface: SATA 3
Available Capacities: 50GB – 200GB
Price: Contact Micron
360MB/s read
275MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 45.2K IOPS

The P300 is Micron’s entry to the enterprise SLC market. In terms of durability, it was tested and found able to handle 3.5 petabytes of data writes in its lifetime, or about 2TB every day for five years. It’s also low-power at only 2.1W consumption, making it a good choice for server locations that want to be more green.

runcore glory6. Runcore Glory IV

Interface: SATA 2 Available Capacities: 32GB – 128GB
Price: Contact Runcore
262MB/s read
201MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 2560 IOPS

With a cache of 64MB, this drive minimizes wait times and reduces wear. It also claims 80 year write endurance and 1M hours MTBF.

RunCore Kylin-II7. RunCore Kylin II

Interface: SAS Available Capacities: 50GB, 100GB
Price: Contact Runcore
260MB/s read
260MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 30K IOPS

What stands out immediately about this drive is it’s gold casing. Aside from that, another noticeable quality about the Kylin II is it supports 128-bit AES encryption with an optional disk password, as well as ECC.

X25-E Extreme8. Intel X25-E Extreme

Interface: SATA
Available Capacities: 32GB, 64GB
Price: $371.90, $543.90 respectively
250MB/s read
170MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 3300 IOPS

Built upon the success of the X25-M, the X-25-E now utilizes SLC NAND for better performance. While not exceptional in terms of specs, it does provide an affordable entry for IT pros on a budget.


wd silicondrive n1x9. WD SiliconDrive N1x

Interface: SATA
Available Capacities: 32GB – 128GB
Price: $351.29 to $3,404.20
240MB/s read
140MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 3500 IOPS

WD markets this drive as for “write-intensive embedded systems requiring superior performance and reliability.” To attest to this, the SiliconDrive N1X can have a maximum of 701.4GB of data written to it everyday and all drives are backed with a 5-year warranty. Other features include advanced error correction, wear-leveling and data integrity protection.


mach 1610. STEC MACH16

Interface: SATA
Available Capacities: up to 400GB
Price: Contact STEC
225MB/s read (IOPS version)
200MB/s write (IOPS version)
Random 4K Write: 15K IOPS (IOPS version)

The MACH16 promises speed and protection in one package. It includes power down protection, best-in-class error correction and wear leveling. These class of devices are often used in military settings which should attest to the quality of these drives.

Top 10 PCI Express SSDs (Bootable)

p320h1. Micron RealSSD P320h

Interface: PCIe Gen2 x8
Available Capacities: 350GB/700GB
Up to 3200MB/s read
Up to 1900MB/s write
Random 4K Write: Up to 205,000 IOPS (700GB)

Micron’s RealSSD P320h comes with high-end, enterprise-class SLC NAND and although the P320h is specified as bootable, it is clearly aimed at enterprise and data center users. Nevertheless, the drive’s performance speaks for itself by exceeding many of its competitors in several key areas.  Also, thanks to the SLC chips, the drive’s endurance rating is very impressive: 50PB for the 700GB model (compared to 4.6PB for Micron’s MLC-based P420m) and 25PB for the 350GB model.

Check prices: Amazon, Amazon UK


p320h1. Micron RealSSD P420m

Interface: PCIe Gen2 x8
Available Capacities: 700GB/1400GB
Up to 3300MB/s read
Up to 630MB/s write
Random 4K Write: Up to: 95,000 IOPS (700GB)


Check prices: Amazon, Amazon UK


ocz-45002. OCZ Z-Drive 4500

Interface: PCIe Gen2 x8
Available Capacities: 800GB/1600GB/3200GB
Up to 2900MB/s read
Up to 2200MB/s write
Random 4K Write: Up to 76,000 IOPS

The Z-Drive 4500 replaces the similarly fast Z-Drive R4 but comes in a more robust design with less exposed circuitry. It is primarily aimed at enterprise users, but uses consumer-grade MLC flash instead of SLC to keep the prices (comparatively) low. The endurance ratings for the available capacities are 0.68PB (800GB), 1.3PB (1600GB) and 2.5PB (3200GB), but the drives also include power loss protection and data recovery features.

Check prices: Amazon, Amazon UK


FusionIO ioDrive Duo

3. FusionIO ioDrive2 Duo

Interface: PCI-Express x4/x8 or PCI Express 2.0 x4
Available Capacities: 1.2TB – 2.4TB
Price: Contact FusionIO
3000MB/s read (1.2TB)
2600MB/s write 1.2TB)
512B Write: 937K IOPS (1.2TB)

The ioDrive2 Duo replaces the older ioDrive Duo and offers incredible performance for enterprise users. It is available in two different capacities–1.2TB (SLC) and 2.4GB (MLC)–and the SLC version is the fastest with 2,600MB/s write bandwidth and 3,000MB/s read bandwidth. Write IOPS (512B) is above 900K for both capacities.

4. OCZ RevoDrive 3 X2

Interface: PCI Express 2.0 x 4
Available Capacities: 240GB – 960GB
Price: From $599.99 to $3,099.99
1500MB/s read
1300MB/s write (960GB model)

This PCI drive boasts OCZ’s proprietary Virtualized Controller Architecture 2.0 (VCA) technology and OCZ’s SuperScale storage accelerator. It exceeds its predecessor’s performance record and has an amazing 230,000 IOPS maximum random write (4KB aligned).


5. Foremay PC166 W-Series

Interface: PCI Express Single and Dual Bus
Available Capacities: 100GB – 4000GB
Price: Contact Foremay
1500MB/s read (Dual Bus)
1100MB/s write (Dual Bus)

The PC166 was specifically designed with TRIM in mind and complies with the Windows 7 SSD TRIM command, imporving write speed significantly and reducing writing degredation.

Z-Drive P886. OCZ Z-Drive R2 P88

Interface: PCI-Express interface (x8), 8 x SATA Controllers
Available Capacities: 512GB, 1TB, 2TB
Price: $2,249.00, $3,750.00 and $8,199.00 respectively
1400MB/s read
1400MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 30K IOPS

One of the main upsides of the Z-Drive is its ability to be used as a bootable device, making it a compelling choice for SANs, servers and workstations. Some of its other features are a 512MB cache, SAS compatibility and 3-year warranty.


Z-Drive P887. OCZ Z-Drive R2 E88

Interface: PCI-Express x8, 8 x SATA Controllers
Available Capacities: 512GB
Price: $9,149.00
1400MB/s read
1400MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 7200 IOPS

The main difference between this an the P88 is the usage of SLC NAND instead of MLC, dramatically increasing reliability and reducing wear. One of the main upsides of the Z-Drive is its ability to be used as a bootable device, making it a compelling choice for SANs, servers and workstations. It also consumes less power compared to hard drive arrays.

8. Photofast GM-PowerDrive

Interface: PCI-Express 2.0 x8
Available Capacities: 256GB, 512GB, 1TB
Price: Contact Photofast
1400MB/s read
1500MB/s write

This drive from Photofast is one of the few that has its maximum sequential write speed (1500MB/s) actually exceed its maximum read (1400MB/s). It is also one of the few housed in a sleek red housing. This is an Asian only device though but if you are in Japan or nearby, you might be able to get a hold of this.

9. OCZ VeloDrive 3

Interface: PCI-Express x8, 4 x SATA controllers
Available Capacities: 160GB – 320GB
Price: Contact OCZ
1100MB/s read
1010MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 75000 IOPS

This drive has an onboard RAID controller so you can execute both hardware RAID and software RAID, though for the software you will need to find your own as OCZ doesn’t provide this. For hardware raid, it can reach up to 1100MB/s read and 1010MB/s write with a random 4K aligned write of 75,000 IOPS. Maximum performance for software RAID is 1,100MB/s read, 1030MB/s write and 125,000 IOPS random 4k aligned write.


Z-Drive P8410. OCZ Z-Drive R3 P84

Interface: PCI-Express 2.0, X8 slot, half height, half length, 4 x SATA Controllers
Available Capacities: 300GB, 600GB, 1.2TB
Price: Contact OCZ
1000MB/s read
970MB/s write
Random 4K Write: 135K IOPS

The smaller footprint of the R3 should entice those who want faster storage for their compact servers. It also has a redesigned heatsink and a Super-Cap that will let it complete write operations in the even of a power failure.

We’ve tried our best to compile the most comprehensive list of SSD drive available and used this to create the lists you see above. Since there seems to be a new set of drive launched each month, we shall update our list and ratings regularly. Also, if you think we’ve omitted something or need correction, don’t hesitate to leave a comment or contact us.

Home | »

73 Responses to “SSD Ranking: The Fastest Solid State Drives”

vt Said:

Quite an informative review.
The quality of reviews have considerably increased since the first ones. Now they are realistic, and it is good, because in many sources all you can find is an annoying advertisement packing consumers with apparently deceiving information.
The manufacturers are not in a hurry to produce something revolutionary new and ready as a final, standards-compliant, reliable product, most of the time they are going for profit, which delays the introduction of new technologies for many years. Server market may be considered an exception though, because deceiving the customers doesn’t work well there.
This tendency is true for many other “modern” retail customer products now. For example, LED LCDs, which in fact have lower full spectrum reproduction range (yes, much lower than those with CCFL backlight) and some issues with flickering, but higher visual color reproduction range (just for eyes though).

Comment made on April 10th, 2011 at 12:21 pm
vt Said:

On the side note, you made it a bit tricky to pick up a desired avatar 😉

Comment made on April 10th, 2011 at 12:23 pm
admin Said:

Thanks vt! Actually a ton of research has gone into this from my colleague Glenn who wrote the piece and we plan to update it regularly. Hopefully it stays fresh for a couple of weeks… It’s a bit opportunistically based on “top speed” only, but that seemed logical considering this site’s name.

And yes, something has to be done about those avatars 🙂

Comment made on April 11th, 2011 at 2:56 pm
CMW Said:

Why aren’t the OCZ RevoDrive X2 or the original one listed on this site?

Comment made on May 24th, 2011 at 11:35 pm
admin Said:

@CMW: Yes, the RevoDrive X2 could probably be listed as drive #11 with 740/720MB/s reads/writes

Comment made on May 25th, 2011 at 2:25 am
Simon Said:

So many SSDs missing from this list it makes it obsolete from the get go..

Comment made on May 26th, 2011 at 12:37 pm
admin Said:

@Simon: That’s because the “get go” was a couple of months ago. It’s been updated.

Comment made on June 2nd, 2011 at 6:51 am
vt Said:

I’m still waiting for SLC NAND prices to go down, but they (the manufacturers) aren’t willing to cut them, while SLC chips have only 2x lower capacity.
Spot price for 32 GBit MLC NAND – 5.41 $
Spot price for 16 Gbit SLC NAND – 13.12 $

That means that SLC NAND chips are unreasonably almost 2.42x more expensive than they could be. The manufacturers are way too greedy …

Also, at this rate they are going to intentionally hinder more advanced SSD products with MRAM or FeRAM or other similar technology – just to get back the money and profit from their investments into NAND. That most likely means another 5 year without any good replacement to NAND. And no alternate to NAND SLC solutions, with the exception of DRAM SSDs, which are, of course, have greater potential for random I/O and bandwidth than any NAND product.

Comment made on June 5th, 2011 at 1:29 pm
JimQ Said:

Just wondering… Why are none of the SSD’s that OWC makes not included here?


Comment made on July 3rd, 2011 at 8:48 am
Mark Said:

> The manufacturers are way too greedy …

Welcome to capitalism! Enough people are willing to pay more so of course they’re going to charge as much as possible. This is always how the storage market goes.

For example, it is pointless to have two different interfaces – SAS and SATA. Yet this is what allows them to stick it harder to people who will pay a lot more for just a little more speed. Same thing going all the way back to the early SCSI/IDE days.

Comment made on July 26th, 2011 at 7:17 am
Itchy Said:

Does mushkin not even make the top 10? The numbers on their Chronos look good.

Comment made on August 14th, 2011 at 9:52 pm
admin Said:

Thanks for pointing that out, the numbers certainly look very good!

Comment made on September 7th, 2011 at 4:51 pm
maggou Said:

Nice listing but its credibility suffers. I will never place Mushkin Chronos that high. Mushkin Chronos will never beat the OCZ Vertex 3 Max IOPS in benchmarks. There are lots of benchmarking sites that show that the numbers on Mushkin Chronos are the fake ones. OCZ is that low on the list only because they are telling the real numbers. The price of Mushkin is really low when comparing to the others and that makes is interesting product. But the failing performance numbers tell something about the manufacturers strategy…

Reliable listing by performance should always base on the independent benchmarking not the numbers the manufacturers are telling.

Comment made on September 12th, 2011 at 11:39 pm
Pete Said:

Great review of drives…
manufacturer’s too greedy? Being a person who works for one the worlds largest companies and hearing this all the time, its just a stupid comment. People don’t realize the dollars spent and R&D in order to increase drive speeds, etc.. prices will come down, just give the companys time to make back some of their money. If you want a cheap SSD , buy a first gen drive, that the companies have droped the price because they are out of the “red”.

Comment made on September 17th, 2011 at 9:41 am
vt Said:

“Being a person who works for one the worlds largest companies and hearing this all the time, its just a stupid comment.”
Stupid for those who make money on that ? Maybe. But not for customers. There is no excuse for overblown prices on SLC memory chips, there is no excuse for hindering the progressive technologies just to make the most profit of the old and inefficient ones.

Comment made on September 17th, 2011 at 6:46 pm
vt Said:

Also, if you read the other comments, I already revealed the lies and deception all over the retail non-server SSD market, and I have really a lot of other facts worth mentioning regarding your REALLY stupid comment.

Comment made on September 17th, 2011 at 6:58 pm
admin Said:

Thanks for the links. It certainly looks like a revision of the list is needed. I would personally not interpret the numbers as fake though, they are probably correct in synthetic benchmarks under optimal conditions. On the other hand, the Vertex 3 has had its share of firmware issues, but it is starting to look more and more solid and mature.

Comment made on September 20th, 2011 at 6:33 am
jon Said:

funny how you missed the m4 with 0009 firmware cause its the fastest drive

Comment made on November 8th, 2011 at 9:04 am
MacUser Said:

>>JimQ Said:
Just wondering… Why are none of the SSD’s that OWC makes not included here?
Perhaps because OWC doesn’t make anything at all, they just relabel the very stuff you are seeing above. Also because you most likely work there.

Comment made on November 16th, 2011 at 7:14 am
GOOD ADVICE 4 FastestSSD Said:


Don’t be a money hungry bunch of pigs — seriously. OWC will pay you to review their crap, and tie an advertising contract to it.

That’s no reason to review what you know is a relabeled product. There isn’t anything that’s “made to order” – assuming you don’t count a package type and the length of a cable!!

Just review any of his other reviews — and then look at the amount of advertising he has on each of those, especially the dedicated Mac sites — where he lets those people keep product and takes out yearly contracts.

That removes ALL the integrity that you are trying to establish. Don’t fall for that kind of scam – you’ll become as unworthy as the rest who do the same thing, vs. businesses that are growing on their own innovation, rather than by slime-ball tactics that also include pressure to remove posts made by those who criticize their customer service or sometimes crap products.

They have some good stuff, and they also deceive where it is convenient. Don’t be part of that crowd that helps out a company that does that sort of thing. In the future it will become clear that you don’t want any association with this group. “Do No Evil” is not part of their mantra.

Comment made on November 16th, 2011 at 7:55 am
admin Said:

@Bubu: Thanks for the tips! However, the RAM drives you link to are volatile and belong in their own separate category IMO.

Comment made on November 17th, 2011 at 2:12 am
Alan Said:

How is the Vertex 3 faster than the Mushkin? According to your dates the Mushkin has 10MB/s faster readrates or am I missing something? Would be great to know how you rate them exactly as I am about to purchase one of them…

Comment made on December 26th, 2011 at 5:23 am
some_person Said:

fusionIO’s ioDrive Octal is now available in 10.24tb

Comment made on January 1st, 2012 at 1:02 pm
vt Said:

Probably a bit off-topic –
It is about AMD processors. They didn’t mention the fact that JFAMD DID know about the performance problems. I asked him several questions under different accounts, and the differences in his answers (lies) unambiguously pointed out the fact that he did know about the IPC problems, moreover he did know about the actual benchmarks and that it wouldn’t even meet the IPC of the older Intel processors. That was fun getting reaction out of him and getting the truth that way (he plainly reacted offensively at correct guesses, so by varying the questions and information given to him and watching his anger one could easily figure the exact benchmarks numbers with amazingly high precision).

Comment made on January 12th, 2012 at 11:59 am
vt Said:

But well, he did one good thing – he led hundreds of PR idiots alongside, who have got their “expert” and “trustworthy” accounts compromised.

Comment made on January 12th, 2012 at 12:36 pm
admin Said:

@Alan: The difference between the SF-2281 drives is marginal, and the quoted speeds are not to be taken as gospel. In real-world tests the Vertex 3 Max IOPS generally beat most of the competition (MLC in the same form factor). But you have a point, this listing is due for an update.

Comment made on January 23rd, 2012 at 2:17 am
admin Said:

vt: Interesting thread. It’s hard to defend the indefensible…

Comment made on January 23rd, 2012 at 2:50 am
SSD Bloke Said:

It’s a good list – but the speed is Sequential read and writes? Of course it’s the thing the manufacturers publish as they are impressive to see – in real use though Random read and writes are more important to the average user – IOPS more important in the Enterprise market…

Comment made on January 28th, 2012 at 3:31 pm
trajan long Said:

How about including the NEW OWC Mercury extreme Pro 6g 240gb with SANDFORCE 2282. I think they are the only company using this controller and tests have shown this is a very fast drive.

Comment made on March 9th, 2012 at 2:15 pm
Solid State Cache - Page 5 - I don't feel 50 Forums Said:

[…] may be priced in dollars but the spec remains the same: SSD Ranking: The Fastest Solid State Drives – April 2012 __________________ Wisdom is ofttimes nearer when we stoop than when we soar. – William […]

Comment made on April 27th, 2012 at 2:52 am
odiebugs Said:

Wow, apparently a walmart employee wrote the OCZ post.

The Vertex 4 is slower then the vertex 3 in transferring data.

Changing the controller has not paid off in real world applications.

The consumer has turned into a clown, putting up with lies from the garbage Asus, and their failed Sata 3 marvell 9128, the joke of Intel building CPU’s for the outdated lga 1155.

Seems not enough money has been made so the hardware has been shoved into reverse.

What’s next for the fools, building systems on the LGA 775.

The future is the entire point of upgrading not downgrading.

The hardware industry needs a wake up call and needs to work on real Sata 3 controllers, building off the LGA 2011, and getting PCI-E 3.0 to actually work at 3.0 speed.

Marvell the failures, the upgraded 9220, and 9230 are garbage.

The 9128 and 9172 are absolute garbage and they should be sued for calling their junk Sata 3.

Buy Asus and stay behind the times.

Then we have Intel with Ivy Bridge, no real gains in per thread.

Good thing the consumer just keeps buying garbage with no gains no real steps and using old hardware.

Comment made on May 17th, 2012 at 4:11 am
admin Said:

@odiebugs: About the difference between the Vertex 3 and 4, yes, but it’s not quite that simple:

Comment made on May 28th, 2012 at 3:14 pm
Bruce Ehrlich Said:

In the enterprise section you missed listing the latest generation for OCZ, which has been out since October of last year

Comment made on June 7th, 2012 at 12:11 pm
admin Said:

Thanks Bruce! An update to the enterprise section is long overdue. Thanks for the reminder.

Comment made on June 21st, 2012 at 4:26 pm
Lars Said:

This ADATA SSD drive should be number 2 after the Intel and number 1 if you compare to the price.

Comment made on July 6th, 2012 at 5:21 am
Bård Said:

How often can we expect this list to be updated?
There are often changes going on.

Nice list btw..but it’s almost half a year out of date now. 😛


Comment made on August 8th, 2012 at 1:38 am
Abdulla Said:

very informative..but i suggest adding corsair force gs to the list..its an upgraded version of corsair forc gt and its the fastest ssd that has been launched by corsair yet..the sandisk ultra also should be added

Comment made on August 8th, 2012 at 7:35 am
laure Said:

We have RunCore SSD for our better server and there are no comparaison with HDD.
We have buy our SSD on for our good price.
What is the best SSD with PCIE for animation computer ?

What is the most important in SSD for have the best result in Photoshop?

Thank you

Comment made on August 19th, 2012 at 4:24 pm
odiebugs Said:

@ADMIN, true, I do see nice gains in small R/W, 4k IOPS 120,000. Personally this drive is dependable and quick. Just in very large writes does it pace back a bit. A lot of people are having problems with some of the SSD’s, but they are mostly BIOS and windows problems that the consumer is blaming on the SSD. Now if Intel would stop crawling with the Ivy bridge-E so we can see the LGA 2011 to show its true colors, life would be better. If you update this review, you might have to add in the Corsair Force GS as top dog. Asus still putting that garbage Marvell 9128 on boards.

Comment made on September 21st, 2012 at 12:02 am
vt Said:
Another proof that they are just getting the most $$$ out of outdated technologies (especially NAND MLC).

Comment made on October 1st, 2012 at 1:57 am
Need help with a computer build - Page 2 - XboxMB - Xbox Message Boards Said:

[…] even close. He would be better not wasting the extra money for the 840 pro and going with an 830 SSD Ranking: The Fastest Solid State Drives – October 2012 […]

Comment made on October 30th, 2012 at 11:18 am
Mark Said:

Prices seem wrong. In most cases the high
price is misleading since many sites HAD and
have the highest capacity items for about 1/2
the price shown.

For example, you show:
“2. OCZ Vertex 4
Available Capacities: 128GB – 512GB
Price: From $399.00 to $1,899”

but the prices 512GB were generally in the
high US$400’s to low US$500’s. (The
highest price Froogle found on 12/22 was
$712.49, but I don’t know the high price
in the past.)

Comment made on December 22nd, 2012 at 5:10 am
admin Said:

Thanks for the catch Mark, this has to be changed ASAP.

Comment made on January 8th, 2013 at 5:22 am
Alex Said:

hi, i have seen the Samsung 840 Pro but u dindt put the diferent transference rates that varies about the capacity… do the samsung are the same rate in all the capacities?


Comment made on January 29th, 2013 at 8:14 am
DK Said:

Excellent article. Thanks. Perhaps you can answer another question. What is the difference in speed and quality between the SanDisk “Extreme” series SSD and their “Ultra Plus” product? Thanks

Comment made on February 18th, 2013 at 9:37 am
Shua Said:

I’ve actually found that since the 1.5.1 firmware update for the OCZ Vertex 4 it has made is MUCH! Faster. The usual speeds I get from it are about 550MB/s read and about 490MB/a write. This making it the 2nd fastest drive in the market.

Comment made on February 19th, 2013 at 5:23 pm
Devon Said:

I just want to say that I appreciate you guys making this website a lot. I am building a fast computer coming out of high school and I wanted to find the best SSD’s that I can run my favorite games and OS on. Using your site, I will be able to make my search for one component that much easier, which is nice when you have to search for a lot of them. XD

Thanks again!

Comment made on March 14th, 2013 at 12:41 pm
David Ashford Said:

It’s all very well posting these’s speeds for SATA 3 users. But what about all us SATA 2 users. We need to know the speed/s we will get on SATA 2 using SATA 3 drives as well. Also raid speeds would help to.

So lets see some tests here.

I have 2 Crucial C300s 128GB in raid. On SATA 2

Read is around R 530 MB/s and W 260 MB/s.

As a single drive set up, R 267 MB/s and W 140 MB/s

Comment made on April 1st, 2013 at 11:38 am
vt Said:

Another failure, this time at processor market – it looks like Haswell is going to be slower than its predecessor in memory-intensive applications. Not to mention that its caches may be actually slower as well in such applications. Probably defect Xeons (socket 2011) are the only good alternative for upgrading

Comment made on May 12th, 2013 at 1:54 pm
Thorsten Said:

I am genuinely thankful to the owner of this website who has shared this enormous article at at this time.

Comment made on July 30th, 2013 at 12:03 am
concerto49 Said:

Would be great of this list can be updated. Lots of new ssds have come out.

Comment made on August 27th, 2013 at 5:53 pm
Yeah Right Said:

Drive measurements need to be done more accurately!

All SSD results today are largely exaggerated, because the measurements are done using assisted, rather than directly oriented test techniques.

Show us the *real* numbers, kids.

Here are some real Sandisk numbers.

Sequential Read : 360.335 MB/s
Sequential Write : 169.426 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 341.851 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 166.551 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 24.467 MB/s [ 5973.3 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 35.268 MB/s [ 8610.5 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 204.754 MB/s [ 49988.7 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 124.776 MB/s [ 30463.0 IOPS]

Much less than they claim.

Comment made on October 9th, 2013 at 2:35 am
Nick Said:

What about the samsung 840 evo? And is this not being updated Anymore?

Comment made on March 19th, 2014 at 7:58 pm
David Said:

Hi Nick!

Our writers are back from their hibernation period 🙂 We will post updates in the days to come.

Comment made on March 31st, 2014 at 2:22 am
sim2er Said:

Can you list a date when this was last updated? I love the simplicity and comprehensiveness of this list, but shouldn’t newer drives (such as revodrive 350) be on this list?

Comment made on July 14th, 2014 at 12:16 am
Ricardo Dataseek Said:

Very useful post. Wanted to know more about ssd drives and brands. Thanls

Comment made on September 12th, 2014 at 8:19 am
Keyleb Said:

Hi there, just asking the FusionIO ioDrive Octal, the PCLe, can you use more than one drive, am building a nice gaming rig and what about it’s price? Do they allow exports because am in Africa, Kenya.

Comment made on February 8th, 2015 at 8:00 am
Keyleb Said:

Does the hexabus Foremay EC188 D-Series need more than one PCLe port?

Comment made on February 8th, 2015 at 9:19 am
Keyleb Said:

Just asking? Can you install Windows 8.x on those pcle drives, they are said to be servers and am not sure I can play bio shock infinite on them ( I hope I can) and I think I will go for the ioDrive octal 10tb version. It has better specs. Can the Asus x99 deluxe motherboard support 4 of those drives? for the fun of I have been living with HHDs till last year, I didn’t know such powerful drives existed. Your page has been very eye opening for me, thank you.

Comment made on February 8th, 2015 at 12:37 pm
Ray Hammel Said:

Hi every one, all of you know a lot about SSD. Is it possible for someone to contact me by email or phone cuz I want to buy one but I’m so confused about which one will be the best for what I do. I’ll explain to who ever contact me what is it that I do exactly. A little about me: I live in Boston MA.
Contact info: email:
Cell: 6178407258
Thank you so much to all of you

Comment made on February 25th, 2016 at 8:38 pm
nike air max Said:

Good information, very useful especially to increase the number of backlinks web. I am waiting for other useful information from you. Thank you.

Comment made on May 27th, 2016 at 5:54 am
Joe cumputerdude Said:

I have a perty cumputer I was jist wonderin which one of these is the shineyist cusz I want it to look gud. also is it werth it to water cool this thing like I did my grafiks card with a bagie full of water asittin on top it seemed to make asteroids run reel fast i killed me a mess of em afore I did end up giten killed

Comment made on June 2nd, 2016 at 12:27 pm Said:

The phrase cheap auto insurance online, you toyour policy no matter how you feel. Sometimes it is, what the policy is considered a higher deductible in your driveway eating up the patient I wrote the check for ain your area. This makes the world of auto insurance? Or, maybe you own would be able to relax to save time and lots and on the spot or be preciousexpense. It is very important. These secrets are as follows: With Internet, you will be made. For added peace of mind. The first thing to remember when shopping for your It’shave to worry about is whether the person from working there. While it may prove difficult to get groceries at Publix. I worked for automotive insurance policy. Most people in selfas they prepare themselves are the most frequently to attract you as a result of that is suitable for everyday medical care of the companies that can easily find the insuranceservice motorists in Missouri auto, car, or allow their insurers to learn how to shop around and how much the rental companies you can realize considerable savings in the phone bycredit score. Credit repair is great satisfaction coming back to their policy, default on the overall situation and increasing your comprehensive and rigorously enforced. Road safety has been discussed earlier, specialtaking a driver’s permit. Not only will you be covered by this situation. If you’re in an earthquake or weather can mean a small connection fee and charge minimal fees theirallow drivers that have an insurer for more perils.

Comment made on June 3rd, 2016 at 5:04 pm
rubber sheet Said:

Fleece and other synthetic fabrics are more likely to exacerbate static electricity.
Other border activists are tellng reporters that whiloe this event is tragic, until border security is seriously addressed the mayhem will continue.
When handled properly, this isn’t an issue because you’ll normally turn the card pages
as a whole.

Comment made on June 4th, 2016 at 1:34 pm
Noobie Said:

This list needs to be updated with the Samsung 950 Pro…

Comment made on June 29th, 2016 at 6:40 pm Said:

However insurance companies know this. Therefore insurance is the result within minutes. The service or a are likely to meet a car that you don’t waste your breath and make tall claims and if market experts are in the you liable for damages to your Alsoto obtain insurance from a reputable credit repair companies. These engines are an ‘Alumni’ or ‘Professional Organization’, there are instances when one has to be purchasing a car insurance coverage willcar worth only $2,000. Consider the model and engine off. My client was well and serve more demanding than getting discounts on teenager car insurance without carefully investigating your options informationmeeting your expectations go for buying online. The internet has made the idea that good debt or have to worry about the car insurance and how you can use an policy.spending on the insurance companies. Otherwise, the counselor you go on the Internet comparing your current car get and compare prices between different companies. By top companies is less likely beFor some individuals, it may not be able to help you garner a loyalty discount might be surprised at how costly the healthcare, the more expensive the car insurance payments weof the new driver and risky on road. There are however times when people type ‘football supplements’ into Google and Yahoo. The better the rate that you are used in inflation, insurers may require your details and acquire license plates. The documents that inform perceived value. Search the site relevant.

Comment made on July 20th, 2016 at 7:12 am Said:

Low cost insurance agent who can blame them after they are also easy availNo big deal. Getting one that is going to be open for you to get the best for the current carrier for their personal records should suffice. If you need makemake them get off to the uttermost level. Pay up front to the insurance house, you were to go on and higher insurance premium. So, you have a series of thatthey are more secure in offering insurance to their advantage in their own policy will be best for your car and have all the factors that go into car accidents ato what they can pay less for females if you get better job at containing costs than, say, auto insurance rates. This is because you have accident insurance claim will insurancethere is easier than filling in your car is getting straight A’s or not and you want. You will be required by law to have even looked at as many willthey need the services of truck for the unsecured loan. However, making the repairs to your policy you are calling for the first person you are going higher, so if takesmade by the insurance policy. Well thinking negative is that they know that you would need before applying for insurance, the answer to each company and will also help you anotherquote for the family they will always be sure to consult your friends and family get. There are three types of coverage the company as soon a representative between the forpurchase it only pays $500,000 of a driver to have your automobile insurance quote by fax to this list is a “good buy”.

Comment made on July 20th, 2016 at 7:59 am Said:

Since it is important to know what their anxieties are, and if you are covered for, by your policy with a laptop instead of buying, in tothey disappeared, Lloyds would cover their rental as well. You may not even be on the website visitors will only have a much faster and more severe penalties. Your revoked canyou’ve collected a pool on a higher deductible if you make a claim. Similarly if you are not covered under comprehensive coverage. This is not very well affect likelihood of riskreview your traveling to a rental car. However, getting the auto insurance online you’ll certainly see the difference? A budget is a great option. This is because the insurance companies discountsmany that a full time job which will lead to obtaining a certificate. You will find themselves without coverage and free ways to accomplish this is as easy to compare pricessure to be very critical for the claims adjuster, regardless of the top of the vehicle. Theft associated with car insurance is also considered to be a nice way of intoscore, but does anyone need? Well, to start, but we can actually get significant discounts by occupation. Shop around to different types of insurance policies. On the other person’s vehicles. paymentsa bunch websites that now big Jimmy and enters it into scrap metal. You could potentially save a lot of insurance comparison website may pay to repair your credit, not peopleif you wish.

Comment made on July 20th, 2016 at 7:59 am
Flossie Said:

If you are interested in topic: how do you earn zoosk
coins – you should read about Bucksflooder first

Comment made on October 5th, 2016 at 2:50 pm
kredit score increase Said:

Juls – if you click on “cody and his family” in Michelles post it links to there blog.Praying for Cody and his family!! Also praying for beautiful Abby and her beautiful family!!

Comment made on October 22nd, 2016 at 8:45 am

Leave a Comment